The CAS website is currently being updated and will be in maintenance mode over the next few days. While you won’t be able to log in to your account during this time, you can still browse the site as usual.
20 May 2022
Programming is intrinsic to computer science
In their second blog, based on the white paper, Practical Programming in Computing Education, the NCCE Academic Board members explain why practical programming is intrinsic to computer science, not just an optional add-on.
The importance of…
Spotted an Issue?
The CAS website is currently being updated and will be in maintenance mode over the next few days. While you won’t be able to log in to your account during this time, you can still browse the site as usual.
Intelino Engineuity Challenge
Elan: new release has Turtle graphics, printing Html, data-file read/write...
Apps for Good & Bosworth Academy: Inspiring future changemakers through Innovate for Climate Change
Assembly Language Simulators
MessageLib - a (WIP) python library to simplify making networked programs
Strype: Python with a blocks-like interface, in the browser - CAS Secondary TC meeting
Raspberry Pi Foundation's Code Editor - TC meeting
Generative AI in programming education: Bridging the gap from school to what lies ahead
Mission Encodeable - Making programming fun - Secondary TC Meeting
Discussion
Please login to post a comment
I very much like the Fred Brooks quote (he’s usually good value) about ‘studying to build, rather than building to study’. As I understand it, Brooks is saying that CS is much more like Engineering than Science (Herb Simon wrote very well about the distinction many years ago in ‘The Sciences of the Artificial’.)
In your blog, Simon, you agree with this assertion, but then hedge your bets by saying ‘In reality, computer science is both science and engineering (and much more too)’ - but you don’t really justify this claim. Could you say more about why you think that, and what ‘much more’ refers to? Thanks.